Think it sounds ridiculous? Bear with me and I’ll explain how I came up with that number. This obviously isn’t the exact cost for every single person, but it probably isn’t far off. I didn’t include the cost of electricity, purchasing and replacing your television, or the cost of lost opportunities due to the hours wasted watching television. I’m also basing the cost on the amount I pay for satellite TV. Your actual costs may be higher or lower (probably higher as I have the most basic package).

#### The Assumptions

I assumed a cost of \$40/month for the subscription. This is the cost of my basic satellite TV subscription. There’s a good chance most people pay more than this, so my estimate is probably conservative.

I assumed you started your subscription at age 22 (when most people are out on their own) and you keep it until you die at age 80.

I assumed an inflation rate of 3.8% and an investment rate of return of 8% (very reasonable over a 59 year time period).

#### The Results

If you decide to give up your cable or satellite TV subscription and instead invest the money, you’d have over \$577,000 at age 80. If we adjust for inflation, that \$577,000 would be about \$63,900 in today’s dollars (e.g., what costs you \$63,900 today will cost you \$577,000 in 59 years because of inflation).

By age 65, you’d have an extra \$177,700 because you gave up that cable/satellite TV subscription. This is the same as \$34,300 in today’s dollars. That could mean retiring a year earlier! (depending on your income needs in retirement)

If you’re 22 and you decide to save \$100 instead of purchasing a TV set, you’ll have an extra \$2,955 by age 65—or \$570 in today’s dollars. (While the price tag says \$100, it’s really costing you \$570 because you could have invested that \$100.)

If you save \$500, that’s an extra \$14,780 by age 65—over \$2,850 in today’s dollars.

If you save \$1,000, you’ll have an extra \$29,550 by age 65—more than \$5,725 in today’s dollars! (That \$1,000 big screen TV is really costing you \$5,725.)

And we haven’t even figured in the cost of lost opportunities because you watched so many episodes of Lost…

#### The \$64,000 Question

If Dish Network, DirectTV, or Comcast told you that subscribing to their service would really cost you \$64,000, would you do it? Even with the first month free, I just don’t see how it’s worth it.

Add in the cost of purchasing a TV (and replacement TVs), the higher medical bills because you sat on your butt so much, and the other reasons you should stop watching TV and you’ll soon find that it’s just not worth it.

If you’re struggling to get by, TV should be one of the first things you cut. It’s a drain on your finances (a \$64,000 drain!), wastes your time, and can get in the way of quality family time. Your time is better spent finding ways to increase your income, cut your expenses, and enjoy your life the way you want (instead of the way the TV tells you to enjoy it).

#### Disclaimer and Other Stuff

Even though I know how much television costs, I have not given it up completely. However, I do watch a lot less than I used to and I’m amazed at how much more I can accomplish! Now I tend to only watch a couple shows on Discovery Channel. (I’m a science geek at heart.) I’ll watch in social situations as well, but overall I probably watch less than a couple hours a week on average.

Not all TV is bad. Like I said, I like to watch Discovery Channel. Educational shows can be a good way to get some entertainment while expanding your mind at the same time. But most TV shows are an absolute waste of time—end of story.

#### Corey

Corey is currently pursuing a Master of Arts degree in religion. While he enjoys learning and writing about Christianity, another one of his new passions is writing about personal finances in order to help others make wise decisions with their money.

### 2 responses to Cable/Satellite TV Subscriptions Actually Cost Nearly \$64,000!

1. My wife and I dropped our premium channels and just have basic cable and internet service via Comcast. We’re saving \$100 a month and not missing a thing. The kids can watch their favorite shows on PBS and Netflix and I can get ESPN on my Xbox 360.

We still have cable because we don’t want the hassle of making a OTA antenna work. Also for \$2 more we have basic cable because it is bundled with our high speed internet. I can live with \$24 a year instead of dealing with installing the antenna.

2. Hi, Dan! Thanks for commenting. Certainly cutting out premium channels saves a lot, and so can bundling with Internet. If it only costs you \$2 more per month for basic cable in addition to your Internet, that sounds like a great deal. Unfortunately, that didn’t look like an option when we got our Internet. However, we’ve been able to find pretty much everything we want to watch online at the network websites or on sites like Hulu. It seems like we’re going to have more and more options as networks start working with their online audiences, so I’m sure there will be plenty of ways to save money. Thanks again!